Purps · UK listing data from MedBud · Batch-tracked by the community
THC 25% · CBD <1%
Photo via medbud.wiki
Name on UK pharmacy menus and prescription labels.
Licensed grower behind this SKU — from MedBud import data or published sources where available.
IP / parent: Tilray Medical
Community-tracked quality changes across every medicine drop
Review posted January 2024
Review posted — January 2024
7 community reviews
Rating: 7.5/10
Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/mango/kush aroma. Highlights: Quality improvement, Strong terpene profile.
Positives
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted June 2024
Review posted — June 2024
9 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/skunk/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted January 2024
Review posted — January 2024
7 community reviews
Rating: 7.5/10
Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/mango/kush aroma. Highlights: Quality improvement, Strong terpene profile.
Positives
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted June 2024
Review posted — June 2024
9 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/skunk/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted January 2024
Review posted — January 2024
7 community reviews
Rating: 7.5/10
Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/mango/kush aroma. Highlights: Quality improvement, Strong terpene profile.
Positives
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted June 2024
Review posted — June 2024
9 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/skunk/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted June 2024
Review posted — June 2024
9 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/skunk/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted June 2024
Review posted — June 2024
9 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/skunk/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted June 2024
Review posted — June 2024
9 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/skunk/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted February 2026
Review posted — February 2026
3 community reviews
Rating: 5.0/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dryness or hay-like cure, dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues, and Underwhelming quality.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Review posted June 2024
Review posted — June 2024
9 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/skunk/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
Issues
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
Purps is a community-tracked medical cannabis cultivar distributed in the UK by Tilray (grown by Tilray Medical). Patients report it is commonly used for various conditions. All reviews on CanVerify are tied to specific batch numbers so you can see how quality varies between harvests.
Community reviews reflect individual patient experiences, not clinical trials. Effects vary by person, batch, and condition. Do not start, stop, or change treatment based on this site alone.